MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332760459 · doi:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000016

Maximizing Athletic Performance in the Heat

2013· article· en· W2332760459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrength and conditioning journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsAthletic Edge Sports Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesClothingTraining (meteorology)Computer scienceApplied psychologyPsychologySimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyAeronauticsMedicineEngineeringPolitical scienceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ATHLETES TRAIN AND PERFORM AT OPTIMAL LEVELS IN COOL ENVIRONMENTS; HOWEVER, MANY INDIVIDUALS DO NOT ALTER THEIR TRAINING IN HOT ENVIRONMENTS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW IS TO EXPLORE EXISTING RESEARCH RELATED TO ENHANCING PERFORMANCE IN THE HEAT BY MODIFYING THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES: (A) HYDRATION, (B) BODY COOLING, (C) HEAT ACCLIMATIZATION, (D) CLOTHING AND PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, (E) NUTRITION AND SUPPLEMENTATION, (F) SLEEP, AND (G) TECHNOLOGY. THIS REVIEW EXPLORES PRACTICAL WAYS ATHLETES CAN CHANGE THEIR EXERCISE HABITS WITH THE GOAL OF INCREASING PERFORMANCE IN HOT ENVIRONMENTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it