MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New approaches in the surgical management of early stage cervical cancer

2001· review· en· W2332785847 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Plante, Michel Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCosmesisCervical cancerFertility preservationStage (stratigraphy)TrachelectomyCancerFertilityQuality of life (healthcare)Cancer stageIntensive care medicineGeneral surgeryGynecologySurgeryPopulationNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quality of life has become a very important issue in deciding the extent of surgical procedures for patients affected with a variety of cancers. In recent years, more attention has been given to preserving organ function, cosmesis, and now reproductive function. As cancer treatment has improved survival in several neoplasias, cancer survivors are becoming more interested in preserving their fertility potential. We focus here on new surgical advances in the management of early stage cervical cancer, with emphasis on the radical trachelectomy technique to preserve fertility potential and the Saling procedure to prevent premature labor. We also discuss the issue of the sentinel node localization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics & GynecologySame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207