MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332837349 · doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000000177

Clinical Characterization of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department

2014· article· en· W2332837349 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Glatstein, Asaf Oren, Gil Amarilyio, Dennis Scolnik, Amir Ben‐Tov, Aiala Yahav, Arik Alper, Shimon Reif

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Emergency Care · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentMedical emergencyEmergency medicinePediatricsIntensive care medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a syndrome characterized by elevated intracranial pressure, without evidence of intracranial mass lesion or venous thrombosis on brain imaging. The syndrome occurs mainly in young, fertile, and overweight women but may present in any age group. The aim of this study was to report the presentation, course, and outcomes of older versus younger children presenting with IIH to the emergency department of our large tertiary care hospital during an 8-year period. METHODS: Retrospective chart review (January 2000-December 2008) of all patients younger than 17 years with IIH was performed on the basis of modified Dandy Criteria. The patients were analyzed according to age (<11 years and 11-17 years) and weight centile (<90%, 90%-97%, >97%). RESULTS: Ages ranged from 2 to 16.5 years (mean [SD], 9.71 [4.56] years). Thirty males (46.8%) and 33 females (53.2%) were identified: 30 were prepubertal with a male-female ratio of 1:0.56 and 33 were pubertal with a male-female ratio of 1:2 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 age groups in proportions of children in the 3 predefined weight categories The most common presenting symptom was headache (75%), which was significantly less common in the younger age group compared with the older group (P < 0.01). Papilledema was present in 51 patients (82.3%). Mean (SD) cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure was 378 (16) mm H2O. Findings of brain imaging (mostly computed tomographic scan), performed in all patients, were normal in 42 (67.7%); the most common finding in the remainder was swelling of the optic nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that IIH should be considered in any child with new-onset headache or visual disturbance, irrespective of age, sex, weight, or the presence of known predisposing factors. When IIH is suspected, neuroimaging should be performed promptly to exclude secondary causes of this condition because IIH in children remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment for IIH can prevent potential visual loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Emergency CareSame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207