MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332864676 · doi:10.1093/ehr/ceq414

Music, Scholasticism and Reform: Salian Germany, 1024-1125, by T.J.H. McCarthy

2011· article· en· W2332864676 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. S. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholasticismHumanitiesHistoryClassicsPolitical scienceArtTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thomas McCarthy has written an exceedingly learned book which makes a major contribution to our understanding of intellectual culture in twelfth-century Europe. As his descriptive title makes clear, McCarthy takes music in the Salian period as his primary focus and demonstrates the role it played in the cathedral and especially monastic culture of Germany, specifically in Reichenau, Regensburg, Hirsau and other southern institutions. Although this book no doubt will satisfy the serious musicologist with its erudite discussion of such matters as the double protus and tetrardus function of D and d or the plagal version of deuterus, McCarthy's interest in the broader place of music theory in central Europe will make his work valuable to any scholar interested in the intellectual currents of the scholastic period or the history of the liberal arts curriculum in general. Among his most notable achievements is in demonstrating so cogently the rich and sophisticated scholarly activities in Germany during the eleventh and twelfth centuries; he thus adds to a growing body of research which seeks to redress the historiographical predilection for studying scholastic France at the expense of other areas of Europe with their own intellectual traditions and pursuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe English Historical ReviewSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207