MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Australian Government Publishing Online a Decade on: Has the Promise Been Delivered?

2007· article· en· W2332877937 on OpenAlexaff
Roxanne Missingham

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Academic & Research Libraries · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsLibrary of Parliament
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingCommonwealthGovernment (linguistics)Project commissioningPublic relationsBusinessElectronic publishingPolitical sciencePublic administrationLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebComputer scienceThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2007 was the tenth anniversary of the report Management of Government Information as a National Strategic Resource, which established the framework for the delivery of Commonwealth Government services online. This paper examines the background to the framework’s development, the actions taken to implement its recommendations, and the situation in 2007, to determine the significant impact of the report. It also notes the role that public libraries have increasingly filled to enable Australians to use these online services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Academic & Research LibrariesSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207