MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332937510 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.064411

Nonlinear behavior for the uniform mode and horizontal standing spin-wave modes in metallic ferromagnetic microstrips: Experiment and theory

2012· article· en· W2332937510 on OpenAlexaff
M. P. Wismayer, B. W. Southern, Xiaolong Fan, Y. S. Gui, C.‐M. Hu, R. E. Camley

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsSpin wavePhysicsFerromagnetic resonanceResonance (particle physics)Standing waveField (mathematics)MicrowavePerpendicularFerromagnetismNonlinear systemSpin (aerodynamics)Magnetic fieldAmplitudeMagnetostaticsOpticsQuantum mechanicsGeometryMagnetization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micron-sized rectangular ferromagnetic bars have a variety of spin excitations, including a quasi-uniform mode, horizontal and vertical standing spin-wave modes, and edge and corner modes. When driven by a strong microwave field, these modes differ from those found in the linear regime. For example, the resonance field or frequency becomes amplitude dependent. We study the nonlinear spin dynamics in such microstrips, both experimentally and theoretically, for a geometry where the static magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane of the sample. Experimentally, it is found that, at a fixed microwave frequency, the resonance field for the uniform mode is significantly reduced as the microwave power is increased. In contrast, the resonance fields for the standing horizontal spin-wave modes are only slightly reduced. This behavior is confirmed theoretically using micromagnetic calculations, and an intuitive explanation for this behavior is developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207