MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332947163 · doi:10.1017/s001708951500021x

GENERALISED ARMENDARIZ PROPERTIES OF CROSSED PRODUCT TYPE

2015· article· en· W2332947163 on OpenAlex
Liang Zhao, Yiqiang Zhou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlasgow Mathematical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAnhui University of TechnologyMemorial University of NewfoundlandAnhui University
KeywordsMathematicsMonoidRing (chemistry)Ideal (ethics)Pure mathematicsContext (archaeology)Product (mathematics)Semiprime ringType (biology)CombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldLawGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let R be a ring and M a monoid with twisting f : M × M → U ( R ) and action ω: M → Aut ( R ). We introduce and study the concepts of CM -Armendariz and CM -quasi-Armendariz rings to generalise various Armendariz and quasi-Armendariz properties of rings by working on the context of the crossed product R * M over R . The following results are proved: (1) If M is a u.p.-monoid, then any M -rigid ring R is CM -Armendariz; (2) if I is a reduced ideal of an M -compatible ring R with M a strictly totally ordered monoid, then R/I being CM -Armendariz implies that R is CM -Armendariz; (3) if M is a u.p.-monoid and R is a semiprime ring, then R is CM -quasi-Armendariz. These results generalise and unify many known results on this subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it