MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Itʼs time for an international congress of physician assistants

2009· editorial· en· W2332989029 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roderick S. Hooker

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAPA · 2009
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceHealth human resourcesPolitical sciencePhysician assistantsHealth carePublic relationsMedicineEconomic growthMedical educationLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“The time has come,” the Walrus said, “To talk of many things: Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax— Of cabbages—and kings—” From “The Walrus and The Carpenter” by Lewis Carroll The time has come to talk of an international congress of physician assistants. The physician assistant profession is growing, and nowhere is this growth more dynamic than outside the United States.1 Lessons learned from 4 decades of experiments provide a template for PA education on a global scale. This is most evident in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Taken together, these two countries have created nine PA programs; there are another three in Canada and three in South Africa. More programs are in development in these countries, sub-Saharan Africa, and elsewhere.2 Many institutions are leading the way in the education and innovative use of PAs. Around the world, academics, social scientists, and researchers are documenting PA behavior and promulgating new information about health care delivery. The body of medical workforce scholars is growing, and the exchange of PA information has accelerated since the new century began. Some of this information flow has taken place through the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) and the Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA), with other PA organizations and individuals serving as consultants. PA experts outside the United States are providing information to other countries as well. On a larger stage, the World Congress meets annually to supply information on employer management of human resources in health care.3 Over the past few years, the PA phenomenon has been a topic of increasing interest at aWorld Health Organization meeting, aninternational Health Economics Associationmeeting, and the annualEmployer Health & Human Capital Congress.As other countries recognize the value that PAs can provide, they meet on a regular basis to disseminate their experience. Perhaps the PA movement is a success that deserves its own international audience. Such an international PA congress could develop a number of goals that would benefit society in many countries. I propose the following objectives: (1) foster the role of the physician assistant; (2) monitor and analyze the changes occurring in medical workforce shortage areas; (3) identify advances and new trends in medical team delivery; (4) identify innovations in the education of PAs; and (5) serve as a clearinghouse for new information. Many types of international congresses exist. Medicine alone has dozens (eg, theInternational Congress of Aviation and Space Medicine has been around for half a century). An international congress of physician assistants could be comprised of a president, vice president, director, and secretary general, all with specific functions and roles. Such a congress could meet biennially in Brussels or Zurich, where political events are unlikely to eclipse the agenda and where the location would be central to the majority of attendees. Promoting information exchange among scientists and professionals interested in the fields of organizational efficiency, comparative and outcomes research, population health, and education would be an important objective. Within the framework of plenary and thematic sessions, as well as workshops and poster sessions, specialists from everywhere could present a review of challenges and solutions. An exhibition, along with the conference, could bring together thousands of professionals and management officials from around the world to promote new and novel products. Such a forum presents opportunities for manufacturers to present their products to new users. The concept of PA organizations looking beyond their domestic boundaries is taking hold. The AAPA, in a bold move, will hold their 2012 annual conference in Toronto, Canada. This is the first time the Academy has held its annual conference outside the United States and represents an “international handshake” with the country that developed the second PA movement. A few years earlier, the PAEA held its annual meeting in Quebec City. Furthermore, PAs are a feature at an International Innovation in Healthcare conference that occurs annually in Heathrow, England. New initiatives are never easy, and such work requires a great deal of interaction. However, new thought leaders have emerged among PAs in several countries; and for them, the world is smaller and easier to access. The growing complexity of health care delivery requires youthful thinkers, unburdened by the clunky history of early PA development, to look ahead. It is this generation that will write the next chapter of the PA movement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.433 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAPASame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207