MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333183715 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00734

Isolating a Reaction Intermediate in the Hydrogenation of 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetophenone on Pt(111)

2015· article· en· W2333183715 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume Goubert, Michael N. Groves, Yi Dong, Jean‐Christian Lemay, Peter H. McBreen, Bjørk Hammer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Chemistry and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLundbeckfondenDanmarks Frie ForskningsfondFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesCanada Foundation for Innovation
Keywordsvan der Waals forceMetastabilityScanning tunneling microscopeDensity functional theoryCatalysisSelectivityChemistryAdsorptionReaction intermediatePhotochemistryComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryMaterials scienceMoleculeNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The isolation and identification of surface intermediates is of the utmost importance for the elucidation of mechanisms and selectivity patterns in heterogeneous catalysis. However, the metastable nature of reaction intermediates makes their detection and differentiation from other species challenging. This work reports a combined variable temperature scanning tunneling microscopy (VT-STM) and van der Waals-corrected density functional theory (opt88-vdW DFT) study showing that a hydroxy intermediate (hy-TFAP) formed in the hydrogenation of 2,2,2-trifluoroacetophenone (TFAP) is trapped by parent TFAP to form a H-bonded bimolecular TFAP/hy-TFAP structure. The facile formation of the hydroxy intermediate, by residual hydrogen present in the ultrahigh vacuum chamber, was predicted based on a previous DFT study of the hydrogenation pathway for TFAP on Pt(111). The prediction is confirmed by comparison of calculated TFAP/TFAP and TFAP/hy-TFAP structures with STM images of bimolecular structures formed through TFAP adsorption and treatment at different temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicSurface Chemistry and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207