MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333186492 · doi:10.2307/2672485

Is a Free Trade Zone Emerging in Northeast Asia in the Wake of the Asian Financial Crisis?

2001· article· en· W2333186492 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kevin G. Cai

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial crisisWakeBusinessFinancial systemEconomicsKeynesian economicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S ince the mid-1980s Northeast Asia' has witnessed a phenomenally accelerating economic integration among its economies, as manifested by the declining importance of the United States both as a market and as a source of investment for Northeast Asian economies and the concurrent deepening economic interdependence among the economies in the region with rising intraregional trade and direct investment flows3 (See Tables 1-5). As an autonomous process, however, growing economic integration in Northeast Asia has been primarily driven by market forces, but short of a formal regional grouping equivalent to the European Union (EU) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The very nature of economic integration in Northeast Asia is due largely to the continuing existence of some significant constraints that make official regional schemes hard-born in Northeast Asia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207