MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2333268671 · doi:10.1117/12.981225

Front Matter: Volume 8444

2012· paratext· en· W2333268671 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaAmes Research CenterConnaught FundNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteMarshall Space Flight CenterUniversity of Hawai'iKorea Research Institute of Standards and ScienceUniversities Space Research AssociationEuropean Southern ObservatoryCarnegie Institution for ScienceSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanUniversity of ArizonaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCarnegie Institution of Washington
KeywordsFront (military)Volume (thermodynamics)Computer scienceFront coverIdentifierPhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringCover (algebra)Programming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large number of submissions to and excellent attendance at the Ground-based \nand Airborne Telescopes IV conference reflects the strong and growing \ninterest in the astronomical and engineering communities. More than 250 papers \nwere submitted to this year's conference, the largest number in the series' history. \nThis year's conference included 28 oral sessions and two poster sessions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9230.897

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→