MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333308838 · doi:10.1061/9780784413128.025

Soil Cementation Generated and Enhanced by Electrokinetics

2013· article· en· W2333308838 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Q. Shang, Ping Hui Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementation (geology)Electrokinetic phenomenaGeotechnical engineeringConsolidation (business)LiquefactionPore water pressureGeologySoil waterSoil liquefactionSubmarine pipelineEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrokinetics has been applied in geotechnical engineering, specifically in soil improvement, for nearly a century. Most engineering applications and research projects have focused on electro-osmotic consolidation generated by the negative pore water pressure, as well as settling of suspended soil solids due to electrophoresis. Although many studies have reported that significant cementation bonds have developed in soils after electrokinetic treatment, a systematic study on the subject (i.e. the mechanism and observations from field and lab experiments) has not been reported. In this review, the cementation developed in marine sediments and offshore calcareous sands is presented along with discussion of the principles of electrokinetic cementation. The study is of particular importance in earthquake engineering for development of soil improvement technologies against seismic loading, because electrokinetics generated cementation of soils may significantly reduce the risk of soil liquefaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207