MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W233332734

Realizing the Truly Postmodern: Valuing Multiple Feminisms

2008· article· en· W233332734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hildy Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueThirdspace · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostmodernismDominance (genetics)HegemonyPostmodern theatreSociologyFeminismOppressionAestheticsGender studiesEpistemologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the last fifteen to twenty years, the ongoing conflict among the various feminisms, which make up feminist studies, has been much discussed. Some feminisms are repudiated and distorted by others, with the discord seemingly becoming more bitter and more intransigent. This article posits that it is the dominance of postmodern feminist thought and the way its features have been misapplied to those of other feminisms that has led to their mischaracterization and to the creative near-stagnation of today. To end the warfare, we must end postmodern feminist hegemony and embrace instead a multi-modal approach in which a plurality of feminisms are considered fairly on their own terms and within their own contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThirdspaceSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207