Un hallazgo significativo: La Doctrina muy proveitosa... tirado do Espelho de bem viuer de Pedro Domènech (Lisboa, 1550). Un manual de formación para la infancia marginada y mestiza en Portugal y Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'objectif de cet article est d'annoncer la mise au jour de l'œuvre de Pedro Domènech (Doctrina muy proveitosa... tirado do Espelho de bem viuer) imprimée à Lisbonne en 1550, dont il n 'existait aucun exemplaire connu. Ce livre était destiné à l'éducation des enfants marginaux et métis au Portugal, au Brésil, et dans le sud-est asiatique. Ce fut le manuel des fameux "colegios de doctrinos". L 'article décrit et analyse son contenu, en le comparant à d'autres œuvres connues de l'époque, et suggère son lien avec le vaste réseau existant des "colegios de doctrinos" espagnols et latino-américains. La découverte de cet exemplaire unique constitue un apport inédit, aussi bien pour l'histoire de l'éducation populaire que pour la littérature spirituelle du XVIe siècle elle-même.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".