MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333355757 · doi:10.3406/hispa.2006.5254

Un hallazgo significativo: La Doctrina muy proveitosa... tirado do Espelho de bem viuer de Pedro Domènech (Lisboa, 1550). Un manual de formación para la infancia marginada y mestiza en Portugal y Brasil

2006· article· fr· W2333355757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin Hispanique · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'objectif de cet article est d'annoncer la mise au jour de l'œuvre de Pedro Domènech (Doctrina muy proveitosa... tirado do Espelho de bem viuer) imprimée à Lisbonne en 1550, dont il n 'existait aucun exemplaire connu. Ce livre était destiné à l'éducation des enfants marginaux et métis au Portugal, au Brésil, et dans le sud-est asiatique. Ce fut le manuel des fameux "colegios de doctrinos". L 'article décrit et analyse son contenu, en le comparant à d'autres œuvres connues de l'époque, et suggère son lien avec le vaste réseau existant des "colegios de doctrinos" espagnols et latino-américains. La découverte de cet exemplaire unique constitue un apport inédit, aussi bien pour l'histoire de l'éducation populaire que pour la littérature spirituelle du XVIe siècle elle-même.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it