MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333362585 · doi:10.2208/jscejipm.70.145

SECOND BEST PRICING OF EXPRESSWAY WITH REFERENCE TO MAINTENANCE COSTS

2014· article· en· W2333362585 on OpenAlexaff
Shunsuke SEGI, Kiyoshi Kobayashi, Takashi Tagami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringBusinessComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本研究では,高速道路と一般道路が並列する道路ネットワークを対象として,道路利用がもたらす混雑と構造物の劣化という外部不経済性を内部化することを目的とした高速道路の次善料金について理論的分析を試みる.その際,大型車と普通車によって道路構造物の劣化に及ぼす影響が異なること,および,一般道路と高速道路の間で構造物の耐荷力が異なることに着目し,車種別の高速道路料金設定による大型車の経路誘導を通じて,混雑費用,維持補修費用の双方を考慮した社会的費用を可能な限り抑制する次善高速道路料金について分析する.さらに,車種別料金を差別的に設定することは,料金設定による大型車の経路誘導を通じた道路ネットワークの維持補修費用の軽減効果の有効性を高めるうえで重要な意味を持つことを示す.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)Same topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207