MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Breast Cancer Events Associated with Germline Mutations of the CDH1 Gene (Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer).

2009· article· en· W2333431835 on OpenAlexaff
Pamela Hebbard, A. MacMillan, Joy McCarthy, Kara Laing, Nancy Wadden, J. Green, Benjamín Fernández‐Gutiérrez, Amy Kwan, Debrah Wirtzfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare ManitobaMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerCDH1CancerProphylactic SurgeryProphylactic MastectomyGenetic counselingGermline mutationOncologyInternal medicineGenetic testingMastectomyMutationGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Breast cancer events associated with germline mutations of the CDH1 gene (Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer).Background: Mutations of the CDH1 (e-cadherin) gene are known to cause an autosomal dominant familial cancer syndrome, commonly referred to as hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. The lifetime risk of gastric cancer may be up to 80 percent. An associated risk of lobular breast cancer has been identified, but less well studied. Lifetime risk of breast cancer in affected women may be up to 50 percent.Method: We identified 17 women in our centre with known CDH1 mutations that have been offered genetic counseling for breast cancer risk. Counseling included discussion of prophylactic surgery, and breast screening via MRI/mammogram. We performed a chart review to identify breast cancer screening, prophylaxis, and treatment events in these patients.Results: 16 patients had adequate chart data to study. Of these, one patient had a breast cancer (T3N0M0) prior to mutation identification. 13 of 15 remaining patients entered into a high-risk breast-screening program with annual MRI and mammogram. Two breast cancers were identified in the first two years of patient screening; both were T1N0M0. Both women opted for bilateral mastectomy. No patient opted for prophylactic breast surgery prior to cancer detection, although several were in the process of prophylactic gastrectomy.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth description of breast cancer events in patients with inherited CDH1 mutations. A majority of patients have opted for a breast-screening program, with successful early detection in two patients. Patients to date have not chosen primary prophylactic breast surgery, but two have chosen bilateral mastectomy upon detection of a malignancy. Further epidemiological studies are required to fully understand the breast cancer pattern and natural history that occurs in this genetic syndrome. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 904.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBRCA gene mutations in cancer→French-language works237,207→