MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2333554429 · doi:10.4136/serhidro.98

Gestão dos Recursos Hídricos em Bacias Hidrográficas: Monitoramento Hidrológico, uma Integração Participativa

2009· article· pt· W2333554429 on OpenAlexaff
Ancelmo Valente, Edna César, Danilo Augusto Faria, Marli Leite, Paulo Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do Seminário de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Paraíba do Sul · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrographyScope (computer science)Structural basinResource (disambiguation)Citizen journalismEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementWater resource managementComputer scienceHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeologyGeomorphologyCartographyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of the Hydrographic Basin of the Pirapitingüi Brook -Valley of the Paraíba" by Ancelmo Arantes Valente.Scope of the research demonstrates the impact of human behavior on hydrographic cycle and volumes of water resulting from the combination of activities and multiple usages.Conclusions are drawn from examples of real conflicts over use of water by scenario simulation, including a proposal for interchange of information between rice farmers and managers, given the character of unique relationship of water in the hydrographic basin and the parameters of Hydraulic Balance.To minimize conflicts, given resource demand versus availability, research was based upon contextualizing several intervening factors in the process of installation, by means of bibliographic search of materials from the most diverse authors and institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais do Seminário de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Paraíba do Sul→Same topicWater resources management and optimization→French-language works237,207→