Structural Analysis and Electrochemical Studies of Carbon Coated Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Particles Used as Anode for Lithium-Ion Battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbon coated Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (C-LTO) particles have been synthesized by hydrothermal method and high-temperature calcination process. Nanostructure and carbon-coating has been characterized in detail by X-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution TEM (HR-TEM), selected electron diffraction (SAED), and scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) combined with X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy. The prepared particles are comprised of highly crystalline spinel-type Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 with the size range of 20-70 nm. HR-TEM imaging and STXM-XANES spectromicrocopy confirmed the amorphous carbon layer uniformly covered on the surface of single LTO particles with optimized content and coating thickness (~5 nm). The electrochemical performance of C-LTO particles as an anode in lithium-ion batteries is evaluated, demonstrating both improved rate capability and cycling performance, which was attributed to the enhanced electron transport/high electrical conductivity and fast lithium-ion insertion/extraction, as a result of uniform and optimized amorphous carbon coating on the C-LTO particles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".