De l’Apocalypse à l’Anthropocène : parcours éthiques des changements climatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le climat et la politique ont été liés ensemble depuis Aristote. Avec Montesquieu, Ibn Khaldûn ou Watsuji, un certain déterminisme climatique est imputé au caractère d’une nation. La rupture de la modernité fait du climat un objet de connaissance scientifique qui, au xx e siècle permet de documenter, malgré les controverses, les changements climatiques liés à l’industrialisation. L’un comme l’autre mettent en péril la survie des êtres humains et des écosystèmes. Les éthiques du climat sont donc à la recherche d’une nouvelle relation avec la biosphère ou Gaïa. Pour certains, avec l’absence d’accords politiques, c’est le début des catastrophes inéluctables. Pour d’autres, l’Anthropocène qui fusionne dorénavant l’histoire humaine à l’histoire naturelle ouvre sur l’action technique. Le débat entre le déterminisme du climat et la liberté humaine est relancé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".