MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333641318 · doi:10.1177/000841740707400201

Exploring the impact of multiple sclerosis on couples: A pilot study

2007· article· en· W2333641318 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carolyn Wilkens Blank, Marcia Finlayson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoping (psychology)Multiple sclerosisQualitative researchPsychologyFocus groupOccupational therapyClinical psychologyClinical PracticeMedicinePhysical therapyPsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease that affects the everyday lives of people with MS and their partners. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of MS on the lives of two couples living with this disease and their coping strategies. METHODS: Three semi-structured interviews with each couple were completed. Partners were interviewed together as a couple and separately. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from the analysis: increasing awareness of change and use of coping strategies. Participants expressed concerns stemming from the progression of MS and changes related to this progression over time. They discussed several coping strategies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings offer occupational therapists guidance with their treatment focus in clinical practice and suggest topics for further qualitative research on couples living with MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.635
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207