MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333643134 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-1892

Vibration Analysis of String-Harnessed Beam Structures: A Homogenization Approach

2013· article· en· W2333643134 on OpenAlexaff
Blake Martin, Armaghan Salehian

Bibliographic record

Venue54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific Research
KeywordsHomogenization (climate)VibrationStructural engineeringComputer scienceBeam (structure)Materials scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complexity of modeling space structures is increased when structural elements are harnessed with signal and power cables. In this paper, consideration is given to the dynamic effects of strings and cables that surround such structural elements. Two periodic patterns for strings are considered in this study. An analytical approach is taken to derive an equivalent, homogenized, continuum model and to find the partial differential equation that governs the bending displacements of the string-beam system. The kinetic and the strain energy terms are expanded in terms of displacement components of the center of a repeated element. Hamilton’s principle is then applied to obtain the partial differential equation. Numerical results for the natural frequencies are presented to study the effects of the strings on the dynamics of the beam structure. Lastly, a linear least squares method is used to derive an approximate expression for the natural frequencies of the string-beam systems in terms of certain system parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207