MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact saisonnier sur la composition foliaire de<i>Lygeum spartum</i>L. en lipides totaux et en acides gras dans la région ouest-algérienne

2006· article· fr· W2333651823 on OpenAlex
Zineddine Benaouda, Zoheir Mehdadi, Slimane Belbraouet, Ibrahim Bouchaour, Laid Hamel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Botanica Gallica · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryComposition (language)Linolenic acidFood scienceStearic acidBotanyFatty acidLinoleic acidBiologyBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The leaf composition of Lygeum spartum L. in total lipids and fatty acids presents a seasonal quantitative variation. The principal components analysis realized in the fatty acids quantified and identified by gas chromatography showed that, in period of estival dormancy, the leaves of Lygeum spartum are characterized by a very low rates in lipids. They are made up primarily of saturated fatty acids of witch the palmitic, stearic and myristic acid are more representatives (group 1). These saturated fatty acids seem, made up a biochemical strategy of adaptation against the hydrous deficit and the extremes temperatures, witch the area of study know. On the other hand, in period of spring growth where the tufts of Lygeum spartum are made up specially of young leaves in the process of growth, we obtained relatively significant rates in lipids with prevalence of the unsaturated fatty acids of which the acids oleic, linoleic and linolenic are most characteristic and set up group 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it