MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333678836 · doi:10.1021/ar200192t

The Woodward–Hoffmann Rules Reinterpreted by Conceptual Density Functional Theory

2012· article· en· W2333678836 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Geerlings, Paul W. Ayers, Alejandro Toro‐Labbé, Pratim Kumar Chattaraj, Frank De Proft

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDensity functional theoryPericyclic reactionFukui functionComputational chemistryContext (archaeology)ChemistryElectronegativityTime-dependent density functional theoryAtomic orbitalStatistical physicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsElectronElectrophile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an attempt to master the overwhelming amount of data on the properties of substances and their reactions, chemists scrutinize them for underlying common patterns. In modern times quantum mechanics (QM) has played a leading role in the understanding of chemical reactivity. In the late 1960s, Woodward and Hoffmann (WH) proposed one of the most successful and elegant approaches to interpret the outcome of an important type of reaction: they could predict the allowed or forbidden character of pericyclic reactions through inspection of the phase and symmetry of the orbitals of the reactants obtained by simple extended Hückel theory. Today much more powerful computational techniques, such as density functional theory (DFT), are available that yield highly accurate results even for large systems. By focusing on the electron density, ρ(r), a fundamental carrier of information compared with the much more complicated wave function in conventional QM, DFT became the computational workhorse for systems of ever increasing complexity. However, the need for the interpretation of computational (and obviously experimental) results remains, and "conceptual DFT" has provided the answer to this challenge within the context of DFT. This branch of DFT has given precision to chemical concepts such as electronegativity, hardness, and softness and has embedded them in a perturbational approach to chemical reactivity. Previously, researchers have successfully applied conceptual DFT to generalized acid-base and, more recently, to radical and redox reactions. In this Account, we present a conceptual DFT ansatz for pericyclic reactions, a stringent test for this density-only approach, because the density has trivial symmetry and no phase. A density response function is the key quantity in a first approach: the dual descriptor f((2))(r), the second derivative of the electron density with respect to the number of electrons. Overlapping regions of the dual descriptor of the reactant(s) with different or the same sign yield pictorial representations similar to the orbital phase and symmetry-based pictures in the WH formulation. In a second approach, a key quantity is the evolution of the chemical hardness at the onset of the reaction. This quantity makes contact with Zimmerman's alternative approach to the WH rules based on the aromaticity of the transition state. Using the dual descriptor and the initial hardness response, we reinterpret the WH results for the four types of pericyclic reactions (cycloadditions, electrocyclizations, and sigmatropic and chelotropic reactions), both thermodynamically and photochemically. We demonstrate that these two approaches, which require only simple quantum chemical procedures (overlapping densities and HOMO-LUMO gap type calculations along a few points of a model reaction coordinate), are intimately related through a relation that converts the local (i.e., position-dependent) dual descriptor into the global (i.e., position-independent) (initial) hardness response. Our results show that with a density-only based approach the WH rules can be reinterpreted, pointing to the fundamental importance of the electron density as carrier of information as highlighted in the basic theorems of DFT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations202
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207