MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333725184 · doi:10.1061/41031(341)121

Realtime Damage Detection in Buildings Using Filter Based Radial Basis Function Network Mapping

2009· article· en· W2333725184 on OpenAlex
Michael Contreras, Satish Nagarajaiah, Sriram Narasimhan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2009 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Warwick
KeywordsRadial basis functionComputer scienceRadial basis function networkFunction (biology)Artificial neural networkBasis (linear algebra)Artificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radial Basis Function networks are extremely fast and require relatively small training data sets compared to other neural network methods such as back propagation. They are also less susceptible to problems with non-stationary inputs because of the behavior of the radial basis function hidden units. This makes RBF methods very attractive for realtime structural health monitoring (SHM) and damage detection. In this study, the aforementioned merits of the the RBF network will be exploited to perform realtime damage detection in buildings which are subjected to both sinusoidal and earthquake gound motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it