MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333790560 · doi:10.1097/iop.0000000000000422

Cytokeratin-Negative Undifferentiated (Lymphoepithelial) Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac

2015· article· en· W2333790560 on OpenAlexaff
Somboon Keelawat, Suppapong Tirakunwichcha, Preamjit Saonanon, Supang Maneesri-leGrand, Preecha Ruangvejvorachai, Sukalaya Lerdlum, Paul S. Thorner

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytokeratinPathologyLacrimal sacMedicineMalignancyEpstein–Barr virusImmunostainingImmunohistochemistryCarcinomaVirusAnatomyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epstein-Barr virus-associated undifferentiated (lymphoepithelial) carcinoma is a malignancy that most commonly arises in the nasopharynx but can also occur in other locations including the lacrimal sac. Generally, this tumor strongly expresses cytokeratin, making the diagnosis straightforward. In the absence of confirmatory immunohistochemistry, the diagnosis can be problematic, particularly for tumors arising in unusual locations. Only 3 cases arising in the lacrimal sac in association with Epstein-Barr virus have been reported in the English literature, and all showed typical pathologic findings. The authors report a fourth case, unique in that it showed negative immunostaining for all cytokeratins tested. The clue to the nature of the tumor came from identification of Epstein-Barr virus by in-situ hybridization and demonstration of tonofilaments by electron microscopy. This case demonstrates that a multimodal approach may be needed in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated carcinoma, especially when occurring in uncommon locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySame topicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207