Simultaneous Capture of Mercury and CO<sub>2</sub> in Amine-Based CO<sub>2</sub> Absorption Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The feasibility of using an amine-based carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) capture unit for the simultaneous capture of mercury (Hg) and CO 2 was studied by carrying out Hg absorption experiments with three different types of absorption solutions: mixtures of sodium chloride (NaCl) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), monoethanolamine (MEA), and blended MEA and NaCl/NaOCl. The results show that it is not effective to use the amine-based CO 2 unit for the concurrent capture of Hg and CO 2 because the Hg absorption performance of aqueous solutions of MEA and blended MEA/NaCl/NaOCl is low. Mixtures of NaOCl and NaCl do not perform as a rate enhancer for Hg removal in the presence of MEA. The presence of Hg in the MEA solutions does not affect the CO 2 absorption performance of MEA. To capture both Hg and CO 2, a two-step capture process that employs an aqueous NaCl/NaOCl solution for Hg removal, prior to CO 2 capture in the amine unit, might be an option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".