Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A methodology is presented for developing a complete set of aircraft loads to be used in the structural optimization of an aircraft wing during preliminary design. Using the software program ASTROS as the platform, a typical mid-size 100+ seat passenger aircraft was selected as the subject of the study. The methods are used in the design of a wing box optimally for minimum weight. This is accomplished while simultaneously evaluating the applied loads on the structure, including aerodynamic loads that account for the structural flexibility. The procedures make use of a finite element model of the complete aircraft, and have the additional benefit of producing a complete set of loads for the wing. The mass distributions (payload, fuel, etc.) are adjusted to produce the critical inertia for each load case. The loads are consistent (not envelope) and comprise flight, landing, ground handling, and gust conditions. The load levels of limit, ultimate and fatigue are all considered simultaneously for the optimization process, to which the appropriate design conditions are applied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it