MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333843516 · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e31828f9e52

Surgical Anatomy of the Ocular Adnexa, David R.Jordan, LouiseMawn, Richard L.Anderson. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

2013· article· en· W2333843516 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thomas F. Freddo

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissection (medical)MedicineAnatomyOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.This is the second edition of this monograph, the ninth of 18 thus far in this series sponsored by the American Academy of Ophthalmology and edited by Dr. Richard Parrish. The first edition of this monograph traces its origins to a dissection manual for ophthalmology residents created by Gardner Watson, MD, from his copious dissection notes compiled throughout his career at the University of Ottawa. The lead author, ophthalmic plastic surgeon David R. Jordan, MD, also from the University of Ottawa, is the link to this lineage. This is not immediately apparent however because none of the academic affiliations of the three orbital and oculoplastic surgeons who authored the monograph are listed. The amply referenced text of about 200 pages is laid out in logical chapters, covering scalp and eyelids, orbital bones and fascial compartments, extraocular muscles, innervation, vascular and lymphatic supplies, and the nasolacrimal system. This text is illustrated with photographs of cadaveric dissections completed by ophthalmology residents at Ottawa and the intraoperative dissections of the author(s). The text benefits as well from the artistic hand of illustrator Tim Hengst whose work is elegantly on display. The chapters are well organized, edited in a single voice, and the text is written simultaneously at two levels. It is detailed enough to serve as a source for the ophthalmic plastics fellow if read verbatim but can be an equally valuable introduction to the anatomy of lids, orbit, and nasolacrimal system for the ophthalmology resident, optometry resident, or fourth year optometry student when read selectively. The basic text is amplified with numerous vignettes on clinical application that offer the reader the answer to the perennially asked question “why do I need to know this?” Some unconventional nomenclature used for anatomical structures departs significantly from that used in standard anatomy texts (e.g., styloid canal substituted for the facial canal and stylomastoid foramen), but unlike novice medical and optometry students, the intended audience will be able to figure these out. If there is a significant limitation to this text as a contemporary companion for the orbital surgeon in training, it is the surprising absence of even a single computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in the monograph. Given the frequency with which imaging is used these days to identify anatomical landmarks and map an optimal surgical approach, an opportunity was lost in not providing the anatomical insights that such experienced surgeons likely bring to the reading of these images. Thomas F. Freddo Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207