MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333873281 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.031306

Excited<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>states in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Zn populated via the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>64</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Zn(<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math>)<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Zn reaction

2013· article· lv· W2333873281 on OpenAlexaff
K. G. Leach, P. E. Garrett, C. E. Svensson, I. S. Towner, G. C. Ball, V. Bildstein, B. A. Brown, A. Diaz Varela, R. Dunlop, T. Faestermann, R. Hertenberger, Drew Jamieson, R. Krücken, S. Triambak, H.‐F. Wirth

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2013
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcited statePhysicsExcitationFormalism (music)ScalingAtomic physicsNuclear reactionQuantum mechanicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for excited ${0}^{+}$ states in ${}^{62}$Zn was conducted via the ${}^{64}$Zn($p,t$)${}^{62}$Zn reaction. Four such states in ${}^{62}$Zn were observed up to an excitation energy of 5.4 MeV. The measured angular distribution for the previously assigned ${0}_{2}^{+}$ state at 2342 keV is consistent with a ${2}^{+}$ assignment, and thus the first excited ${0}^{+}$ state is now assigned at 3043 keV. Due to the energy scaling in the currently adopted formalism for isospin-mixing corrections in superallowed Fermi $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay, ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{C1}$ for ${}^{62}$Ga is reduced by nearly a factor of two. This result shifts the theoretical value closer to previous experimental determinations of the same quantity through ${}^{62}$Ga superallowed $\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay branching-ratio measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5590.498

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207