MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333878617 · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.042709

Dissociative excitation of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>by electron impact

2009· article· lv· W2333878617 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen J. Brotton, Eric Vyskocil, W. Kedzierski, J W McConkey

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2009
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsExcitationAtomic physicsElectron ionizationElectron captureElectronEnergy (signal processing)Fragmentation (computing)Analytical Chemistry (journal)IonizationNuclear physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vacuum-ultraviolet emissions following the dissociative excitation of ${\text{H}}_{2}\text{S}$ by electron impact at 100 eV incident energy have been measured. The absolute photoemission cross sections are presented over the wavelength range from 94 to 170 nm and the H, SI, or SII transitions producing the features identified. The measured cross section of the Lyman-$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ emission at 121.6 nm for an electron-impact energy of 100 eV is $(9.79\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.67)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}\text{ }{\text{cm}}^{2}$. Excitation functions of the dominant H and SI emission lines are shown for electron-impact energies from threshold to 300 eV. We study the near-threshold region of the excitation functions and use the measured threshold energies to identify the dominant fragmentation channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207