MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333903492 · doi:10.1061/40976(316)494

A New Algorithm for Water Distribution System Optimization: Discrete Dynamically Dimensioned Search

2008· article· en· W2333903492 on OpenAlexafffund
Bryan A. Tolson, M. A. Esfahani, Aaron C. Zecchin, Holger R. Maier

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceGenetic algorithmAnt colony optimization algorithmsMeta-optimizationAlgorithmMathematical optimizationOptimization problemOptimization algorithmGlobal optimizationEstimation of distribution algorithmMathematicsMachine learningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dynamically Dimensioned Search (DDS) continuous global optimization algorithm by Tolson and Shoemaker (2007) is modified to solve discrete, single-objective, constrained Water Distribution System (WDS) design problems. The new algorithm is called Discrete Dynamically Dimensioned Search (DDDS). DDDS characteristics parallel those of DDS, namely that it is a simple, parsimonious and efficient global optimization algorithm. This paper evaluates DDDS in relation to Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for WDS optimization. The first implementation of DDDS, called DDDS-v1, was developed and then applied to the Hanoi (HP) and New York Tunnels (NYTP) benchmark WDS optimization problems without algorithm parameter-tuning and with a simple parameter-free penalty function approach. DDDS-v1 results are good for the NYTP in comparison with published ACO and GA results. DDDS-v1 identified the best known solution to the NYTP in 5/20 optimization trials. For HP, DDDS-v1 generated better average results than any ACO and GA results available from a previous study. Importantly, DDDS-v1 had no trouble finding the feasible region and returned final solutions from this region that were on average improved relative to other algorithms. Overall, findings suggest that DDDS shows good potential as a new tool for WDS optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207