MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of simulated harvest injury and relative humidity during the first week post-harvest on potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i>L.) tuber weight loss during subsequent storage

2014· article· en· W2333937474 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara J. Daniels-Lake, Robert K. Prange, J. Walsh, Kimberly Hiltz, Stephanie Bishop, Kathleen Munro-Pennell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative humiditySolanum tuberosumHorticultureHarvest timeWeight lossAnimal scienceBiologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryThe effects of relative humidity (RH) immediately after harvest, and simulated harvest injury on the loss of fresh weight (FW) in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers during storage were studied over two years. Tubers were hand-harvested and, within 4 – 6 h, were placed in sealed, ventilated storage chambers at 13ºC and 75, 85, or 95% RH for up to 1 week, with or without a simulated harvest injury (i.e., by abrasion or by excision of a small portion of the tuber surface). Tubers were weighed individually at the start of the trial and re-weighed 12, 24, 48, 72, or 168 h post-harvest. Tubers from the 168 h (1 week) evaluation were subsequently stored on a bench in a walk-in, refrigerated coldroom (109.7 m3) at ca. 88% RH, and were re-weighed 2 and 5 weeks after harvest. Mean total FW loss values 168 h after harvest were 1.2, 1.6, and 2.1% of the initial FW under 95, 85, or 75% RH, respectively. These differences were still apparent after a further 4 weeks in the coldroom. Thus, 5 weeks after harvest, mean total FW loss values were 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8% of the initial FW among tubers originally stored for 1 week at 95, 85, or 75% RH, respectively. Tubers with simulated harvest injuries lost weight more rapidly than intact tubers under all three RH conditions, and during subsequent cold storage. Mean total FW losses 168 h after harvest at 95% RH were 1.2, 1.7, and 2.1% of the initial FW in intact, abraded, or cut tubers, respectively. These values increased to 2.7, 3.4, and 4.0% of FW, respectively, 5 weeks after harvest. Although the interaction between RH and simulated harvest injury was not statistically significant, there was a trend towards a greater loss of FW in tubers with simulated injuries under low RH (P ≤ 0.09), compared to intact tubers kept at high RH. Since the effect of low RH at the start of the storage period continued to affect the quality and quantity of the crop later during storage, lack of attention to RH at this critical time has the potential to reduce economic returns for producers and/or storage managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Horticultural Science and BiotechnologySame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207