Prescriptions pour l'enseignement de la grammaire au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après avoir critiqué la notion de maitrise de la langue , pilier du Socle commun de 2006, nous esquissons un historique des prescriptions à propos de l’enseignement de la grammaire dans les programmes québécois de français du secondaire de 1980 à nos jours, relevant la tension entre rupture et continuité. Enfin, nous présentons quelques effets de ces prescriptions à partir des résultats d’une recherche en cours qui montrent que prescriptions étatiques et pratiques effectives sont deux mondes. Constatant l’importance des changements imposés à la discipline français, nous nous interrogeons sur leur pertinence, compte tenu du peu de mesures mises en place pour permettre aux enseignants de les intégrer à leurs pratiques. Nous émettons l’hypothèse que les changements dans les pratiques enseignantes n’ont lieu que lorsque les principaux acteurs le décident parce qu’elles leur semblent non seulement pertinentes mais possibles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".