MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6 Genetic Variation Predicts Letrozole Plasma Concentrations in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer.

2009· article· en· W2333962656 on OpenAlexaff
Zeruesenay Desta, Rachel F. Tyndale, Ewa Hoffmann, Yvonne Kreutz, Anne Nguyen, David A. Flockhart

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLetrozoleBreast cancerMedicineAromatase inhibitorInternal medicineCYP2A6PharmacokineticsOncologyEndocrinologyPharmacogenomicsPharmacogeneticsCancerPharmacologyAromataseGenotypeBiologyCytochrome P450CYP3A4Metabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The potent aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole is effective in the treatment of postmenopausal women with steroid-hormone-receptor–positive breast cancer (metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant). The beneficial and adverse effects of letrozole vary widely among patients, and differences in pharmacokinetics may contribute to this variability. Letrozole is primarily cleared by hepatic metabolism. Since CYP2A6 has been implicated in letrozole metabolism in vitro, we tested the influence CYP2A6 genetic variants on plasma concentrations of letrozole in breast cancer patients. Methods: Postmenopausal women with early stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were recruited into an ongoing multicenter randomized clinical trial to study the pharmacogenomics of two AIs, exemestane (25 mg/day) and letrozole (2.5 mg/day) given orally. Total accrual to the trial is anticipated to be 250 in each arm. Three months plasma letrozole concentrations were measured by HPLC from 146 patients who were randomized to the letrozole arm and multiple CYP2A6 variants were genotyped from genomic DNA. Results: Plasma concentrations of letrozole showed wide variability among patients (16.6 ng/ml to 141.2 ng/ml; 8.5-fold difference). Genotypes were grouped based in to normal (*1/*1), intermediate (*1/*9 and *1/*12, n=23) and slow (*9/*12, *1/*2, *2/*9, *1/*35, *1/*4E; n=12) metabolizers based on genotyped predicted phenotype. A statistically significant difference in letrozole concentrations was observed among the patients with the different genotype groups (p<0.0001; one-way ANOVA), with strong gene-dose effect relationship (r2=0.28; p<0.0001). Letrozole plasma concentrations were significantly higher in patients with the slow or intermediate genotypes than those with normal genotype (p < 0.0001; Dunn's post-test for multiple comparison correction).Conclusions: Polymorphisms in the CYP2A6 gene account for ∼28% of variability in letrozole concentrations in breast cancer patients. Prior genotyping for CYP2A6 variants may help to identify patients who benefit from letrozole and who experience adverse effects from the drug. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5160.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEstrogen and related hormone effects→French-language works237,207→