MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2333973322 · doi:10.2208/jscejcei.68.i_127

DETECTION METHOD OF LOCALIZED SURFACE DISTRESS FOR PAVEMENT SURFACE MONITORING BASED ON A QUARTER-CAR ALGORITHM

2012· article· en· W2333973322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kazuya TOMIYAMA, Akira Kawamura, T. Ishida

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser F3 (Civil Engineering Informatics) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Surface (topology)AlgorithmRoad surfaceEngineeringComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryCivil engineeringGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

舗装の維持管理上,優先的に補修が必要となる箇所を的確に把握することはきわめて重要である.本研究では,舗装路面の損傷について,クォーターカー(QC)アルゴリズムを用い,機能的側面から評価が必要なひび割れ箇所の検出方法について,ウェーブレット理論に基づき検討した.その結果,Lifting Schemeにより,QCフィルタ適用後のプロファイルから,機能評価上重要なひび割れ損傷箇所およびその類似箇所が検出できることを確認した.本研究成果は,車両振動応答に基づく路面モニタリングの高効率化に寄与するものと期待できる.一方,特異点検出時の閾値については,路面モニタリングデータを蓄積するとともに,舗装の管理目的に応じた設定が必要である.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser F3 (Civil Engineering Informatics)Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207