MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334033447 · doi:10.4161/rna.19818

An enzyme-coupled high-throughput assay for screening RNA methyltransferase activity in<i>E. Coli</i>cell lysate

2012· article· en· W2334033447 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniela Schulz, Andrea Rentmeister

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMethyltransferaseRNABiologyFive-prime capMethylationEnzymeMolecular biologyBiochemistryLysisMessenger RNANon-coding RNADNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-transcriptional modifications of RNA diversify the genetically encoded sequences and play important roles in fundamental cellular processes like mRNA and rRNA maturation. Most RNA methylations are catalyzed by S-adenosylmethionine-dependent RNA methyltransferases. An assay for rapid and easy detection of this enzymatic activity would be highly desirable to identify novel RNA methyltransferases, test S-adenosylmethionine analogs or screen RNA methyltransferase inhibitors. We have developed an enzyme-coupled assay to determine the activity of trimethylguanosine synthases, a class of RNA methyltransferases responsible for RNA cap hypermethylation in eukaryotes. We show that this assay can be used in E. coli cell lysate to measure the activity of recombinantly produced trimethylguanosine synthase. Potential hits are validated for formation of hypermethylated product using HPLC and MALDI-TOF-MS. Furthermore, we demonstrate how this assay can be implemented to screen methyltransferase inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRNA BiologySame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207