MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334071461 · doi:10.1021/am500582e

Covalent Grafting of Chitosan onto Stainless Steel through Aryldiazonium Self-Adhesive Layers

2014· article· en· W2334071461 on OpenAlexaff
Xuan Tuan Le, Ngoc Duc Doan, T Dequivre, Pascal Viel, Serge Palacin

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueMiQro Innovation Collaborative Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceChitosanGraftingCovalent bondCorrosionCoatingAdhesiveLayer (electronics)Surface modificationChemical engineeringElectrochemistrySulfuric acidX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyPolarization (electrochemistry)Composite materialElectrodeMetallurgyOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the conventional methods for strong attachment of chitosan onto stainless steel require many steps in different solvents, it has been demonstrated in this work that covalent grafting of chitosan on a steel surface can be easily achieved through the formation of a self-adhesive surface based on aryldiazonium seed layers. Initially, a polyaminophenyl layer is grafted on a stainless steel surface by means of the one-step GraftFast(TM) process (diazonium induced anchoring process). The grafted aminophenyl groups are then converted to an aryldiazonium seed layer by simply dipping the substrate in a sodium nitrite acidic solution. That diazonium-rich grafted layer can be used as a self-adhesive surface for subsequent spontaneous coating of chitosan onto the steel surface. X-ray photoelectron and impedance electrochemical spectroscopies were used to characterize the pristine and modified steel samples. As evidenced from impedance and linear polarization results, the primary polyaminophenyl layer characterized by a high charge transfer resistance contributed to better protection against corrosion of the resulting chitosan-coated steel in sulfuric acid medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207