MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334085174 · doi:10.1021/ja301608q

Localized Reaction at a Smooth Metal Surface: <i>p</i>-Diiodobenzene at Cu(110)

2012· article· en· W2334085174 on OpenAlexafffund
Lydie Leung, Tingbin Lim, Zhanyu Ning, J. C. Polanyi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryReagentMetalIonic bondingHalogenationHalideChemical reactionReaction dynamicsCrystallographyPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryIonInorganic chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halogenation at a semiconductor surface follows simple dynamics characterized by "localized reaction" along the direction of the halide bond being broken. Here we extend the study of halide reaction dynamics to the important environment of a smooth metal surface, where greater product mobility would be expected. Extensive examination of the physisorbed reagent and chemisorbed products from two successive electron-induced reactions showed, surprisingly, that for this system product localization and directionality described the dynamics at a metal. The reagent was p-diiodobenzene on Cu(110) at 4.6 K. The first C-I bond-breaking yielded chemisorbed iodophenyl and I-atom(#1), and the second yielded phenylene and I-atom(#2). The observed collinear reaction resulted in secondary encounters among products, which revealed the existence of a surface-aligned reaction. The molecular dynamics were well explained by a model embodying a transition between an a priori ground state and a semiempirical ionic state, which can be generally applied to electron-induced chemical reactions at surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207