BARRY A. JACKISCH. The Pan-German League and Radical Nationalist Politics in Interwar Germany, 1918-39.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mostly dormant since the 1980s, scholarly interest in the Pan-German League has recently undergone a renaissance. During the past decade, Rainer Hering and Peter Walkenhorst have explored anew Pan-German ideology from the 1890s to 1945, and Stefan Frech, Julia Schmid, and Johannes Leicht have illuminated the connections among leading Pan-Germans, networks of radical nationalists, and right-wing political organizations, including the Nazi Party. Barry A. Jackisch adds to this literature with his intelligent study of the Pan-German League from 1918 to 1939. In contrast to historians who identify the League as the ideological precursor to and ally of the Nazi party, Jackisch argues that it competed with the Nazis and contributed to Nazi success indirectly by generating tensions within the field of right-wing politics during the Weimar era. For Pan-German efforts to forge a unified opposition to the Weimar Republic out of the diverse and often mutually hostile constituencies of the German Right, he maintains, involved attacks on the forces of “moderate conservatism,” which might have served as an “alternative to Hitler's radicalism and broad popular appeal” (p. 7).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".