MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334272305 · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.011603

Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter states of an electrolytic drop on charged surfaces

2012· article· en· W2334272305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNetworks of Centres of Excellence of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCarbon Management Canada
KeywordsElectrolyteDrop (telecommunication)SuperhydrophilicityVoltage dropNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChemical physicsContact angleChemistryPhysicsComposite materialThermodynamicsEngineeringPhysical chemistryCurrent (fluid)Mechanical engineeringElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we provide a theory for the Wenzel and the Cassie-Baxter states of an electrolyte drop on charged surfaces. An electric double layer (EDL) develops when the electrolyte drop comes in contact with the charged surface. Therefore, the EDL free energy affects these states by triggering a hydrophilicity-inducing tendency. Consequently, an originally hydrophilic condition leads to a superhydrophilic Wenzel state, and an originally hydrophobic condition leads to a less hydrophobic Wenzel state. For the Cassie-Baxter state, this gives rise to the most remarkable situation of a hydrophilic (as compared to the original) Cassie-Baxter state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it