MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334282823 · doi:10.1149/1.2356217

Microfluidic Tools for Assessing the Multiphase Properties of Water in PEMFC Gas Diffusion Electrodes

2006· article· en· W2334282823 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joseph D. Fairweather, Perry Cheung, Daniel T. Schwartz, Jean St‐Pierre

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBallard Power SystemsUniversity of Washington
KeywordsMicrofluidicsCapillary actionProton exchange membrane fuel cellCapillary pressureMaterials scienceElectrodeMultiphase flowSaturation (graph theory)Gaseous diffusionPorosityPermeability (electromagnetism)Mass transportPorous mediumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fuel cellsChromatographyComposite materialNanotechnologyMechanicsMembraneChemistryChemical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microfluidic Tempe cell, a new tool for measuring multiphase flow parameters, is presented. The cell is suitable for acquiring the saturation-dependent capillary pressure, Pc(S), and relative permeability, kr(S), for thin porous PEMFC electrodes. A laser-drilled porous Teflon sample for the validation of capillary pressure measurement is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207