Uranyl Ion Extraction with Conventional PUREX/TRUEX Ligands Assessed by Electroanalytical Chemistry at Micro Liquid/Liquid Interfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The facilitated ion transfer (FIT) of uranyl or dioxouranium (UO(2)(2+)) was studied electrochemically using a micro interface between two immiscible electrolytic solutions (micro-ITIES) in order to evaluate the complexation stoichiometry and complexation constants (β) of two widely used ligands in spent fuel reprocessing: tributylphosphate (TBP) and octyl(phenyl)-N,N-diisobutylcarbamoylmethyl-phosphine oxide (CMPO). For the first time, discrete interfacial complexation reaction steps of varying uranyl to the two ligands ratios were resolved using the micro-ITIES hosted at the tip of a 25 μm diameter glass capillary. Two stoichiometries for UO(2)NO(3)TBP(n)(+) were determined including n = 3 and 4 with β values of 3.2 × 10(11) and 3.9 × 10(13), respectively. Subsequently, three distinct complexation reactions of CMPO with UO(2)(2+) were discovered corresponding to UO(2)NO(3)CMPO(2)(+), UO(2)NO(3)CMPO(3)(+), and UO(2)CMPO(5)(2+) whose respective complexation constants were determined to be 8.0 × 10(11), 8.8 × 10(14), and 6.5 × 10(32). The participation of nitrate anions in these complexation reactions is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".