MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334307471 · doi:10.1049/el.2015.4143

Efficient discrete Gabor transform with weighted linear combination of analysis windows

2016· article· en· W2334307471 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Li, Liang Tao, Hon Keung Kwan

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGabor transformMathematicsAlgorithmComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionTime–frequency analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel discrete Gabor transform (DGT) with a weighted linear combination of analysis windows is presented, which can utilise the optimal weights to change the shape and width of the combined analysis window so as to improve the time–frequency resolution of the Gabor spectrum. The optimal weights can be solved by minimising the objective function with the mixed ℓ 1 and ℓ 2 norms of the DGT coefficients, which leads to the maximum time–frequency concentration of energy on the time–frequency plane, or equivalently, the optimal time–frequency resolution. Experimental results show that the proposed DGT is highly effective in time–frequency analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207