MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334329924 · doi:10.11159/ijepr.2012.003

Drinking Water Source Contamination Early Warning System and Modelling in China: A Review

2012· review· en· W2334329924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationWarning systemEnvironmental scienceChinaWater sourceWater contaminationEarly warning systemWater resource managementEnvironmental planningComputer scienceGeographyEcologyBiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China’s fast pace industrialization and growing population has led to several accidental surface water pollution events in the last decades. This has severely affected the safety of large populations downstream whom are dependent of these waters for drinking. In other countries such as the USA, several accidental pollution events have forced these to develop early warning systems (EWSs) for the protection of their drinking water sources. The government of China, in its 11th Five Year plan, after the 2005 Songhua River incident, has pushed for similar actions. Despite recent government efforts, there are still many weaknesses and gaps in EWS in China such as the lack of pollution monitoring and advanced mathematical models to predict and forecast pollution events. The application of existing physical models for water quality prediction in China can be challenging due to information availability issues. Data Driven Models (DDMs) such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have acquired recent attention as an alternative to physical models which require large amounts of data, do not take into account nonlinear hydrological properties, are computationally demanding and not always flexible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it