MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2334335898 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2008-0021

Optimizing Maternal Mental Health Within A Primary Health Care Centre: A Model Program

2008· article· en· W2334335898 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Angela Bowen, Marilyn Baetz, Nora McKee, Nancy Klebaum

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthorityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaSaskatchewan Health Research FoundationRoyal University Hospital FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMental healthMultidisciplinary approachPostpartum depressionNursingMedicineStigma (botany)Depression (economics)Primary careHealth careService providerCollaborative CareMental illnessPopulationPsychiatryFamily medicineService (business)PregnancyEnvironmental healthBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depression is a common problem that affects approximately 10 to 15% of pregnant and postpartum women. Health care providers often fail to recognize depression in this population, and pregnant and postpartum women may be reluctant to seek help because of the stigma associated with mental illness. This article describes the Maternal Mental Health Program, an innovative, shared care program that brings together previously fragmented services and co-locates multidisciplinary clinicians within a primary care setting. This approach shows promise with respect to improving mental health outcomes; meeting the needs of women, health care students, and service providers; and increasing awareness of and access to specialized mental health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health→Same topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum→French-language works237,207→