MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334336621 · doi:10.1021/je5003303

Solid–Liquid Equilibria of the Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>+ H<sub>2</sub>NCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>H + H<sub>2</sub>O System from (288.15 to 328.15) K

2014· article· en· W2334336621 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Lü, Xun Zhou, Lianwei Chen, Lijuan Zhang, Sohrab Rohani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSolubilityCrystallizationIsothermal processDissolutionThermodynamicsAqueous solutionChemistrySodium sulfateChemical equilibriumPhase equilibriumMass fractionPhase diagramSulfatePhase (matter)Solid solutionActivity coefficientSolubility equilibriumSodiumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyPhysical chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid–liquid equilibrium (SLE) and solution density data for the (Na 2 SO 4 + H 2 NCH 2 CH 2 SO 3 H + H 2 O) system from (288.15 to 328.15) K were measured by use of the method of isothermal dissolution. From the experimental data, a set of polynomial equations were derived to calculate the solubility of taurine as a function of sodium sulfate mass fraction in the equilibrium solution, and two phase diagrams at (293.15 and 318.15) K were constructed. In general, the density of the equilibrium solution regularly increases with the sodium sulfate concentration. Furthermore, at low temperatures the equilibrium solid phase is Na 2 SO 4 ·10H 2 O, whereas at high temperatures the equilibrium solid phase is Na 2 SO 4 . All of these data will provide a better understanding of the separation of taurine from Na 2 SO 4 aqueous solutions through crystallization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0100.007
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207