MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334340081 · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12426

Cacchioni, T.Big Pharma, Women, and the Labour of Love. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2015. 184pp. $50 ISBN‐10 1442611375 (hbk) $21.95 ISBN 13: 978‐1442611375 (pbk) $21.95 ISBN 978–1‐4426–1137–5 (ebk)

2016· article· en· W2334340081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elham Amini

Bibliographic record

VenueSociology of Health & Illness · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityGender studiesSociologyPillSexual dysfunctionNarrativePsychologyMedicinePsychiatryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally approved female Viagra (the pink pill) as a ‘fix’ for female ‘sexual dysfunction’. This decision was made after rejecting the drug twice due to its limited effectiveness as a sex ‘corrector’ drug. Should we consider this drug as a sexual enhancer for women and a solution to women's ‘sexual problems’? Does the drug offer women a sense of choice and equality and what does this mean for how we understand women's sexual experiences? Although Big Pharma, Women and the Labour of Love was published before the FDA's final approval, it is a key reference for responding to the above questions. Cacchioni's important book sits at the intersection of medical sociology and the sociology of sexualities. It explores diagnostic procedures of female sexual dysfunction, the medicalisation of women's sexual problems, and the influence of pharmaceutical companies in this process. Using empirical data, Cacchioni examines the impact of pharmaceutical companies on women's sexual expectations and norms, exploring how women's sexual problems are constructed in the sexual pharmaceutical era when a woman's voice has rarely been heard. The vivid narratives illustrate women's understanding of their sexual problems and the strategies they use to address them in their everyday lives. Moreover, by conducting in-depth interviews with the practitioners who treat these women, and attending sex-related community events for women experiencing sexual pain, Cacchioni explores the ways that medical and sexual experts maintain a heteronormative definition of sexual desire. By connecting feminist and sociological arguments on sex and medicalisation with an analysis of heteronormativity, Cacchioni challenges the pervasiveness of the medicalisation of heterosexuality which constructs norms that remain relatively unachievable without the use of drugs. The book is organised into six chapters and an epilogue. Chapter 1 chronicles the making of a sexual enhancement drug which involves oversimplifying our understanding of human sexuality. Drug companies first ‘make the illness’ and then manufacture and commercialise their products to fix the problem. Chapter 2 develops this discussion by concentrating on the treatment of women who experience sexual pain as an example of validating penetrative sex, even if the women themselves are not willing in this act. In this chapter, Cacchioni unfolds a nuanced and critical evaluation of medical experts’ strategies (medicalisation, demedicalisation, and do it yourself) for sexual pain treatment. In Chapter 3, Cacchioni challenges the definition of normal and successful heterosexuality and elaborates on how it can restrict women's experience of sexual pleasure. Chapters 4 and 5 make wider claims on the commodification, liberalisation, and medicalisation of sexual relationships which, by creating gold standards for sexual pleasure and desire, make pleasurable sex complicated for women. These two chapters develop the literature on ‘sex work,’ tailoring women's sexual response to fit sexual norms, and Cacchioni identifies three types of sex work in this respect: ‘discipline work,’ performance work and ‘avoidance work.’ Discipline work intends to change a woman's mental and physical sexual response by strategies such as sex therapy and taking medicine. Women, also, may engage in performance work by faking orgasm and avoidance work by practicing sexual avoidance strategies. Chapter 4 analyses the accounts of participants who actively tried to achieve the gold standard of heteronormativity and Chapter 5 explores the ways in which some participants challenged these standards. In her final chapter, Cacchioni makes a case for critically considering the relationship and connections between medicalisation and heteronormativity. Throughout this book, Cacchioni challenges the dominant theory that sees ‘hypoactive sexual desire disorder’ as a derivative of biomedicine. Instead, she tries to relate female sex and sexual responses to broader sociocultural conditions and changes in the pharmaceutical-related sex era. She scrutinises the ways that drug companies try to gain support - such as funding certain research projects, using social media, and creating their own clinics - in order to create a market of women who identify themselves as having hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Cacchioni's analyses are carefully nuanced, tending to emphasise the complexity of sexuality while connecting with frequently opposed domains. Cacchioni was among the activists who campaigned against the approval of the drug. Therefore, her knowledge of the field and impressive documentation contributes to the development of a sophisticated understanding of the growth of pharma-sex and its critiques. As a feminist sociologist, she argues that cultural expectations of sexual desire, pleasurable sex, and heterosexuality have a critical impact on women's experience of sex. Cacchioni insightfully characterises this as the paradox of the post-feminist age and highlights the importance of exploring women's lived experience in order to understand sexual pleasure from their point of view. In sum, Cacchioni's book is an interesting and engaging read for sociologists, medical practitioners, sexologists and women who identify themselves with sexual problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociology of Health & IllnessSame topicPharmaceutical industry and healthcareFrench-language works237,207