MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334416965 · doi:10.1021/jp111485w

Dynamical Properties of Hydrogen Sulphide Motion in its Clathrate Hydrate from Ab Initio and Classical Isobaric−Isothermal Molecular Dynamics

2011· article· en· W2334416965 on OpenAlexaff
Niall J. English, John S. Tse

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersRoyal Irish AcademyIreland Canada University Foundation
KeywordsChemistryClathrate hydrateAb initioMolecular dynamicsMolecular physicsHydrateDipoleCrystallographyCoupling constantComputational chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equilibrium ab initio (AI) and classical constant pressure-constant temperature molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed to investigate the dynamical properties in (type I) hydrogen sulphide hydrate at 150 and 300 K and 1 bar, and also lower temperatures, with particular scrutiny of guest motion. The rattling motions of the guests in the large and small cavities were around 45 and 75-80 cm(-1), respectively, from AIMD, with the corresponding classical MD modes being 10-12 cm(-1) less at 150 K and around 5 cm(-1) lower at 300 K. The rattling motion in the small cavity overlapped somewhat with the translational motion of the host lattice (with modes at circa 85 and 110 cm(-1)), due in part to a smaller cage radius and more frequent occurrences of guest-host hydrogen bonding leading to greater coupling in the motion. The experimentally determined H-S stretch and H-S-H bending frequencies, in the vicinity of 2550-2620 and 1175 cm(-1) [H.R. Richardson et al., J. Chem. Phys.1985, 83, 4387] were reproduced successfully in the AIMD simulations. Consideration of Kubic harmonics for the guest molecules from AIMD revealed that a preferred orientation of the dipole-vector (or C(2)-axis) exists at 150 K vis--vis the [100] cube axis in both the small and large cavities, but is markedly more significant for the small cavity, while there is no preferred orientation at 300 K. In comparison, classical MD did not reveal any preferred orientation at either temperature, or at 75 K (closer to the AIMD simulation at 150 K vis-à-vis that approach's estimated melting point). Probing rotational dynamics of the guests reinforced this temperature effect, revealing more rapid rotational time scales at 300 K with faster decay times of dipole-vector (C(2)) and H-H-vector (C(2)(y)) being similar for each cage, at around 0.25 and 0.2 ps, respectively, versus approximately 0.45 and 0.5 ps (large) and 0.8 ps (small) at 150 K. It was found that the origin of the observed preferred orientations, especially in the small cages, at 150 K via AIMD was attributable to optimization of the dipolar interaction between the guest and outward-pointing water dipoles in the cavity, with guests "flitting" rotationally between various such configurations, forming occasionally hydrogen bonds with the host molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207