MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334421575 · doi:10.1021/ma402177v

Reactivity of Polyolefins toward Cumyloxy Radical: Yields and Regioselectivity of Hydrogen Atom Transfer

2014· article· en· W2334421575 on OpenAlexaff
Graham E. Garrett, Elena Mueller, Derek A. Pratt, J. Scott Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen atom abstractionReactivity (psychology)RegioselectivityRadicalPhotochemistryPolymer chemistryIsobutyleneHydrogen atomSteric effectsEthylene oxidePolymerAlkylOrganic chemistryCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen atom abstraction from a series of homopolymers by cumyloxy radicals is examined under solvent-free conditions at temperatures that are relevant to radical-mediated polymer modifications. Abstraction efficiency data acquired for the thermolysis of dicumyl peroxide (DCP) within pure polymer samples establish an order of reactivity: poly(butadiene) (PBD) > poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) > poly(ethylene) (PE) > poly(propylene) (PP) > poly(isobutylene) (PIB). The regioselectivity of hydrogen transfer from PE, PP, and PIB is assessed by model hydrocarbon experiments involving nitroxyl trapping of the alkyl radicals generated from pentane, 2,4-dimethylpentane, and 2,2,4,4-tetramethylpentane, respectively. Taken together, abstraction efficiency and regioselectivity data are discussed in terms of enthalpic and entropic contributions to H atom transfer rates, with particular emphasis on steric hindrance imposed by methyl substituents on secondary positions within PP and PIB. The utility of polymer oxidizability as a predictive measure of the reactivity of a polymer toward cumyloxyl and vinyltriethoxysilane graft modification is evaluated and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207