MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334458090 · doi:10.1021/ma3015189

Two-Way CO<sub>2</sub>-Switchable Triblock Copolymer Hydrogels

2012· article· en· W2334458090 on OpenAlexaff
Dehui Han, Olivier Boissière, Surjith K. Kumar, Xia Tong, Luc Tremblay, Yue Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerLower critical solution temperatureSelf-healing hydrogelsPolymer chemistryDissociation (chemistry)Chemical engineeringChemistrySolubilityThermoresponsive polymers in chromatographySol-gelMaterials sciencePolymerNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryPhase (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CO 2 -responsive ABA triblock copolymer hydrogels are described. Through rational block copolymer design, these hydrogels could undergo either CO 2 -induced gel-to-sol or the reverse sol-to-gel transition. While the middle block B is water-soluble, the solubility of the two end blocks A can be switched by CO 2 . For the gel-to-sol transition, the A block was made to have a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) that can increase upon CO 2 bubbling, while for the sol-to-gel transition, the A block was designed to have a LCST that decreases with CO 2 . Repeated cycles of hydrogel formation and dissociation could be achieved by simply passing CO 2 and an inert gas alternately through the solution, at a constant temperature and without adding acids and bases for pH change. Moreover, CO 2 -induced release of an encapsulated protein was demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations146
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsFrench-language works237,207